![]() ![]() S1 has better humanize and mass note editing options by far, easier to access by default, etc. As a Surface user, I hardly ever get out my key anymore. S1 is far better at doing a daytime theme if you use a glossy laptop outside (Surface Book here) S1 navigation and workflow is vastly superior over all. S1 has a transform tool similar to the velocity compression handles in Cubase. Studio one pro update#S1 had track data import before Cubase, they just didn't sell it as a big update item. S1 notation is great and fast to work in, fits any # of notes into a tuplet/run S1 has tabbed CC lanes AND multiple if you want. ![]() The caveat is I do not use templates (maybe I'm an idiot), so it is highly unlikely I will achieve crazy track counts like many here do. I did disable AU and am using just VST based on numerous reports that VST works better than AU with S1. No sign of the Kontakt issues some have reported and my initial tests on CPU efficiency have been encouraging (very close to LPX 128 buffer/48K). THe GUI is very responsive and snappy, the workflow and ease of use is great, I have had zero issues so far with either installation and I have experiemnted quite a bit on the iMP with many VST's and my UAD effects. So far (early days), I'm really happy with S1. Both machines are running the latest version of Catalina. THe iMP rig has an Apollo X6, 2 TB satellites and a ton of plugins (both instruments and effects). Studio one pro upgrade#To jump to the punchline, I took advantage of the recent PluginAlliance deal for the S1 Pro competitive upgrade for $200 and installed it on both my 2016 MBP and 2017 iMP. So I was again shopping for a cross platform DAW. While I prefer to stay on MacOS even at a price premium, it is not clear how the ARM thing will shake out. Studio one pro mac#There is no doubt it probably wins the feature/capability checklist, but I never really enjoyed using it.įast forward to now and once again, there is a bit of uncertainty in the roadmap of high-end Apple machines going forward, to say nothing of the shocking price of even the current Mac Pro. Studio one pro windows#I was never comfortable with several aspects of Cubase, notably the exploding windows UI and the sheer complexity and non-intuitive way of doing certain things. Quite a few questions, but it's to target my future purchase.įirst some background - I have been a Logic user for a very long time with a short Cubase/PC off ramp in between my MP 5.1 and the announcement/release of the iMac Pro (my current machine). Then for Studio One Pro 5, there is the Atom SQ controller which looks pretty fucked up.įor Studio One Pro 5 there is also the Faderport 16, which also gives it an advantage, a complete system from the same company, therefore, compatibility and stability should be ensured. It s true not launching clips, but editor of drums and patterns which are not bad and which are a bit like the drum rack in Live 10. I really like Live 10 it is true, but the possibilities of Cubase (perhaps too gas-powered) and Studio One Pro 5 (easier to handle compared to Cubase), make me say that more complete than Live, even if not the same operating philosophy. Here beyond trying it, I would like to hear from those who know each of the two daw or even those who have used both and compare the pros and cons. Having a certain resemblance, but apparently better point for Studio One Pro 5, better ergonomics, which one to choose between Cubase Pro 10.5 and Studio One Pro 5? Here, it is not a question of instability of not knowing and asking a lot of questions for a dozen Daw, but just knowing the most ergonomic, reliable, efficient, having the most useful functions without rocking in the gas plant. ![]() After your opinions on Live 10 and Cubase Pro 10.5, I would like to have your opinions and feedback on Studio One Pro 5. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |